header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DELAYED REFERRAL OF SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS



Abstract

Purpose: To determine the mode of presentation of soft tissue sarcomas to a tertiary centre and the factors associated with a delay in diagnosis and referral.

Methods and Results Between 2000 and 2002, we identified 120 patients with primary soft tissue sarcomas histologically verified at our institution. We reviewed the case histories, referral letters and the histology reports in all cases. The mean age of the study group was 54.5 (range 10 to 91 years). Pathological diagnoses included 32 liposarcomas, 20 malignant fibrous histiocytomas, 19 synovial sarcomas, 12 leiomyosarcomas, 9 fibrosarcomas, 7 spindle cell sarcomas, 4 pleomorphic sarcomas, 3 identified only as high grade soft tissue sarcomas, 3 epithelioid sarcomas, 2 extraosseous Ewing’s sarcomas, 2 malignant round cell tumours and one each of neurofibroma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, angiosarcoma, alveolar cell sarcoma, extraosseous chondrosarcoma, extraosseous osteosarcoma and clear cell sarcoma of tendon sheath.

Presenting features included a discrete lump or diffuse swelling in 115 patients (95.8%). Pain was not a feature in 69 patients. 3 patients (2.5%) presented with pain alone and 2 patients (1.7%) with varicosities. 116 patients (96.7%) were referred to our unit as a possible soft tissue sarcoma. 4 patients were referred as suspected benign lesions requiring specialist assessment owing to size and location. 46 patients (38.3%) ignored their swelling, resulting in a delay to presentation to their local units. In only 13 patients was pain a feature. These were not considered to be true delayed referrals. 24 patients (20%) experienced a delayed referral to our unit. An alternative diagnosis was suggested in 7 patients by preliminary imaging investigations. A ‘Whoops procedure’ was performed in 14 patients. 3 patients were initially misdiagnosed as muscular injuries, with consequent conservative management resulting in delay.

Conclusion: Soft tissue sarcomas are relatively rare when considered alongside benign soft-tissue lesions. Pain is an infrequent feature, which may result in patients undervaluing their significance and delay their initial presentation to a doctor. Delayed referral is relatively common, although may not always be avoidable. Clinicians should maintain a high level of suspicion when dealing with soft-tissue lesions, with referral to a specialist centre whenever concern exists as to the nature of the lesion.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Roger Tillman. Correspondence should be addressed to BOOS at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN