header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PAEDIATRIC EXTREMITY TRAUMA IN WAR



Abstract

Introduction: Children are inevitably casualties in wars. They are treated variously by local doctors and foreign surgeons working for military and Non-Governmental Organisations. The basic principles of surgical treatment of war wounds are the same as for adults, but there are specific differences in injury pattern and the response to injury that must be borne in mind.

Method: Casualties under sixteen years age with extremity trauma caused by missiles or blast admitted to a British military field hospital during the latest Gulf War were evaluated. The date, time and method of wounding were recorded and ICRC Wound Scores calculated. The details of surgical treatment prior to admission, and further surgical management described. Case studies were used to illustrate particular considerations relevant to paediatric trauma.

Results: The records for sixteen wounded children were available for analysis. Their ages ranged from three to fifteen years. The method of injury falls into three phases, gun-shot wounds during the mobile attack, shell fragment wounds during the seige of urban areas and blast/fragment injuries from small munitions from the period following active fighting. Blast/fragment wounds typically affected multiple body areas.

Half the patients had received surgical treatment before reaching the hospital, either at civilian hospitals, forward military surgical units or both. None of this surgery was strictly “life or limb-saving”. Amputations performed prior to admission were in the proximal tibia and followed the long posterior flap pattern appropriate to an adult amputation for vascular disease regardless of the level of injury. Several had primary closure of war wounds. After admission, four patients required plastic surgical procedures, two had ophthalmic surgery, one had a laparotomy and one had a facial reconstruction procedure in addition to surgery for extremity trauma. One child with fragment wounds was undergoing treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Conclusion: A military hospital must be prepared to treat children during war-time. Multi-system injury patterns are common and require multidisciplinary care. When possible children should be transferred to a facility with specialist care available for primary surgery. The effects of injury and treatment on future growth should be given more consideration.

The abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, Mr Robin W Paton. Correspondence should be addressed to BSCOS at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35– 43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN