header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DISTAL RELEASE VERSUS TRANSFER OF THE RECTUS FEMORIS MUSCLE FOR TREATMENT OF AMBULATORY PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY.



Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of distal rectus femoris (RF) release versus transfer to treat gait abnormalities of the knee in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy.

Patients & Methods: Thirty-nine children were included in this study. Thirty patients (55 limbs) underwent RF transfer at a mean age of 11.8 years. and nine (16 limbs) underwent distal rectus release at a mean age of 12.5 years. Indications for surgery included RF contracture and abnormal activity during swing phase in dynamic electromyography (EMG), whether with the presence of kinematic characteristics of stiff-knee gait or not. All patients had pre- and postoperative gait analysis and EMG. To evaluate functional outcomes, patients were grouped by pre-operative knee kinematics (normal; swing-phase peak knee flexion (PKF) < 50°; and peak knee flexion > 50° happening later than 77% of the cycle). All data was analyzed statistically.

Results: For the group of patients with PNF< 50°, this value increased significantly after rectus transfer (p=.005). Children with PNF> 50° and later than 77% of the cycle, showed significant improvement in timing after both procedures (p=.001; p=.02). When kinematic parameters were normal before surgery, they did not improved, although patients experienced a significant decrease of muscle contractures.

Conclusions: According to the results of this study, RF transfer would be the preferred procedure for those patients with preoperative swing-phase knee flexion < 50°. For the rest of patients, both procedures brought similar results. We opt for distal RF release since is technically easier, particularly when one-stage multilevel procedures are being performed.

The abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, Mr Robin W Paton. Correspondence should be addressed to BSCOS at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35– 43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN