header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

RANDOMISED PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF SURGICAL VS NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE – CLINICAL RESULTS



Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of patients treated with Achilles tendon rupture randomized to surgical or non-surgical treatment where both groups received the same early motion and weight bearing rehabilitation protocol.

Fifty patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years with a clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendon rupture were randomized to surgical or conservative treatment. All injuries had occurred within ten days. Both groups received the same rehabilitation program with initial cast immobilization then splintage in a removable orthosis with ankle motion commencing at two weeks. Patients completed the MFAI, a validated outcome questionnaire and clinical assessment including range of motion and calf squeeze response at 2, 6 and 12 weeks, 6 months and one year.

There was no difference between the surgical and non-surgical groups for difference in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion between the injured and non-injured sides. There was no difference in the MFAI quality of life scores for either treatment group. There was the same number of re-ruptures in both groups. There were no infections in the operated patients.

Early motion rehabilitation after Achilles tendon rupture results in similar functional results and patient satisfaction in both surgically and non-surgically treated patients.

The abstracts were prepared by Jean-Claude Theis. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dunedin Hospital, Private Bag 1921, Dunedin, New Zealand.