header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

CHONDROSARCOMA OF THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS – PRESENTING FEATURES, TIMELY DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT OPTIONS AND SURVIVAL



Abstract

Introduction: The aims of the study were to analyse the presenting features of chondroasarcoma for prognostic significance, to observe the effects of grade and surgical management on local recurrence, metastasis and survival: and to assess the significance of delays to consultation and treatment.

Methods: From Scottish Bone Tumour Registry Records, 24 proximal humeral chondrosarcomas were treated between 1937 and 2002 in several hospitals in Scotland. Clinical records were available for all patients. Only 4 patients were eventually lost to follow-up. Age at presentation ranged for 16 to 79 (median 56) and male to female ration was 2:1. Patients were followed up for a range of 5 months to 24 years (median 6.5 years). Tumour histology was systematically reviewed: 5 (22%) were grade 1, 12 (52%) were grade 2, and 6 (26%) were grade 3. Dedifferentiated tumours were considered as grade 3.

Results: Pain was almost invariable (23/24), but its severity increased with grade. In the absence of pathological fracture (fracture in 4 Patients), swelling was significantly associated with increasing grade (X2+8.56, p+0.0139), as was symptom progression (X2=7.52, p=0.0232). Delay in diagnosis was calculated separately as ‘patient delay’ (range 0–69 months) and ‘doctor delay’ (range 0–132 months). No improvement in diagnostic delay was noted in this time period (1937–2002)

All cases were biopsied. 37% of these were excisional biopsies, 29% were incisional biopsies and 17% were needle biopsies. 21 patients (88%) received definitive surgery. Of these 5 had forequarter amputations (24%), 11 cases were excised marginally (52%), and 5 cases curetted (24%). Surgical choice was highly dependent on grade (X2=4.9256, p=0.005). In all cases the intent was curative.

2 patients had metastasis disease at diagnosis, and 5 developed metastases after definitive surgery. 4 patients had local recurrence (all had undergone wide local excision). All patients with grade 1 tumours remained disease free. Cumulative survival at 5 years was 57% and at 10 years 42%. Patient age did not affect survival. 5 year survival in grade 1, 2 and 3 tumours was 100%, 83% and 20% respectively. 4 of 5 patients undergoing amputation developed metastases and survival was significantly worse in the amputation group. Local recurrence in the wide local excision group did not diminish prospects for survival.

Discussion: Swelling predicts aggressive disease; as found in studies in childhood sarcomas. Progressive symptoms and serve pain are additional features indicative of high histological grade. In contract to improvements noted in several other studies, patient delay is highly variable and has not been demonstrably reduced over time.

Curettage was chosen for most grade 1 and some grade 2 tumours. Although maintenance of function is far better, our study provides no evidence that curettage results in increased local recurrence rates. Indeed, local recurrence in the wide local excision group did not depress survival figures. Because of early death in the amputation group, we would recommend avoidance of amputation in favour of wide local excision in almost all cases if possible. Age alone should not be a factor in determining surgical treatment.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Roger Tillman. Correspondence should be addressed to BOOS at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN