header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

IN VIVO COMPARISON OF KNEE KINEMATICS PCR AND PS TKA UNDER PASSIVE AND WEIGHT-BEARING CONDITIONS



Abstract

Introduction: Previous in vivo kinematic studies have assessed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) motion under weight-bearing conditions. This in vivo study analyzed and compared posterior cruciate retaining (PCR) and posterior stabilized (PS) kinematics under passive and weight-bearing conditions in subjects implanted with both a PCR and PS TKA.

Methods: Eighteen subjects were implanted with a PCR and a PS TKA, by a single surgeon using a similar surgical technique. Both implant designs had similar condylar geometry. Femorotibial contact positions for all 18 subjects (PCR and PS), implanted by a single surgeon, were analyzed using video fluoroscopy. Each subject,while under fluoroscopic surveillance, performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend and a passive, nonweight-bearing flexion. Video images were downloaded to a workstation computer and analyzed at varying degrees of knee flexion. Femorotibial contact paths for the medial and lateral condyles, axial rotation and femoral condylar lift-off were then determined using a computer automated model-fitting technique. Femorotibial contact anterior to the tibial midline in the sagittal plane was denoted as positive and contact posterior was denoted as negative.

Results: Under passive and weight-bearing conditions, the PCR TKA experienced more paradoxical anterior translation than the PS TKA. Under passive, non weight-bearing conditions, the PS TKA, on average, experienced 3.5 mm of posterior femoral rollback, compared to only 0.6 mm for the PCR TKA. Under weight-bearing conditions, the PS TKA experienced only 0.6 mm of posterior femoral rollback, compared to 0.9 mm for the PCR TKA. The maximum anterior slide was 10.0 mm for the PCR TKA and only 2.7 mm for the PS TKA. There was greater variability in both the PCR and PS anteroposterior data. Subjects having a PCR TKA experienced more normal axial rotation patterns. Sixteen of 18 PCR TKA experienced a normal axial rotation pattern under weight-bearing conditions, while only 9/18 PS TKA experienced a normal pattern. Nonweight-bearing, passive axial rotation patterns were more abnormal for both groups than the weight-bearing patterns. The greatest difference between passive and weight-bearing conditions occurred in the condylar lift-off data. Under passive conditions, both TKA groups experienced significantly greater magnitude and incidence of condylar lift-off. The maximum amount of condylar lift-off under passive conditions was 5.0 mm for the PCR TKA and 6.4 mm for the PS TKA.

Discussion: This is the first in vivo kinematic study to assess a comparison between PCR and PS TKA implanted by the same surgeon in the same patient. Subjects in this study experienced more abnormal kinematic patterns, especially condylar lift-off, when tested under passive, nonweight-bearing conditions. Subjects having a PS TKA experienced less variability in their kinematic data, but PCR TKA, on average, experienced more normal axial rotation and less condylar lift-off.

The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdonschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.