header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

O3174 OUTCOME FOLLOWING INTRADISCAL ELECTROTHERMAL THERAPY: PROSPECTIVE STUDY WITH MINIMUM ONE YEAR FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Aims: The aim of our study was assess the outcome following intradiscal electrothermal therapy in patients with chronic discogenic back pain. Methods: 57 patients underwent IDET. All patients had an MRI and provocative discography to conþrm that their pain was of disco-genic origin. Pre-IDET, patients completed: a pain visual analogue score (VAS), an employment assessment and a pain diagram. Post-IDET assessment included a VAS, a subjective outcome assessment, an SF36 and an employment assessment. Results: 46 (80.7%) patients with a mean age of 41.2 years (range 16–76) were successfully followed up. IDET performed at one level in 48 patients and at two levels in 9. The mean follow-up was 19 months (Range 12–32 months). There were 27 males and 19 females. There were no serious complications. The mean pain VAS was 6.6 pre-IDET and 6.3 Post IDET (not signiþcant). 54% of patients stated that they were either Ç much better È or Ç a little better È. Subgroup analysis suggests that neither the presence of mild facet joint arthritis nor undergoing IDET at more than one level has an effect on outcome. Ç Non-organic È preoper-ative pain diagrams (as assessed by principles described by Mann et al) had a signiþcant negative effect on outcome, with patients in this group having a having a deterioration in VAS from 6.75 to 8.3 and only 10% stating that their pain was Ç a little better È and none Ç much better È. Conclusion: We believe that our study demonstrates that IDET can achieve satisfactory results in the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain, but that patient selection is important in achieving this outcome.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.