header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

O2451 POLYETHYLENE WEAR AND INSERT MICROMOTION IN RETRIEVED TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS: DOES THE LOCKING MECHANISM DEGRADE WITH TIME?



Abstract

Aims: It has been suggested that the capture mechanism of modular polyethylene tibial inserts degrades with time in-situ. This study evaluates micromotion, polyethylene wear and tissue histology in contemporary cemented TKRñs retrieved at autopsy. Methods: Twelve cemented, PCL-retaining TKRñs of the same design were retrieved at autopsy after 41(15–74) months in-situ. Patient age and body weight averaged 73 years and 90 kg, respectively. Insert micromotion was measured according to published protocols on 6 of the 12 TKRñs in which the modular tibial component was undisturbed at retrieval and on 6 unused control components. Tissue histology was evaluated using a semi-quantitative grading system. Articular and backside surface damage was measured using published techniques. Results: There was no signiþcant difference (t-test, p=0.12) between the micro-motion index for retrieved inserts (154±121 um) and control inserts (62±53 um). Backside surface damage covered 38%±23% and was dimpled in appearance without scratching or pitting. Damage covered 46%±8% of the articular surface. Micromotion was negatively correlated with in-situ time (r=−0.94) and backside damage (r=− 0.97). Conclusions: Micromotion for these autopsy-retrieved TKRñs is less than half the 380 micron magnitude measured for other autopsy-retrieved designs, as reported by Engh. Micromotion was greatest on inserts with the least backside wear and the shortest time in-situ. These data suggest that backside damage resulted from axial compression of the polyethylene insert against the baseplate rather than micromotion.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.