header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

O2321 POOR OUTCOME FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS PIN FIXATION OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES



Abstract

Aims: The purpose of the study was to analyse the early experience of the technique of transitory percutaneous pinning to manage three and four part proximal humeral fractures. Methods: An independent review of 66 consecutive patients with proximal humeral fractures treated in our unit over a three-year period was carried out. The patients underwent closed reduction under image intensiþer guidance with percutaneous pinning using an average of 3.5 wires (range 3–4). A standard three dose prophylactic antibiotic regime was used. A protective collar and cuff was the used for 4 weeks, and a physiotherapy program of pendular movements going on to assisted active exercises started after this. The wires were typically removed in an outpatient setting at 4 to 6 weeks. Results: The postoperative radiographs were deemed satisfactory with good overall alignment by two external observers in all cases. Our þndings were however remarkable for a very high early complication rate. This included pin migration (50%), stiffness (41%), pain (33%), infection (25%), nonunion (8%) and radial nerve palsy (8%). The complication rate increased dramatically in those over the age of 50 or those with osteopenia. Conclusions: The technique of transitory percutaneous humeral pinning is technically demanding. Our early experience would suggest high rates of early complications and readmissions. This technique should be applied with caution in older patients with osteopenia.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.