header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

O1282 THE EVALUATION OF THE SYNDESMOTIC DISRUPTION BY MRI-ARTHROGRAPHY AT DENIS WEBER TYPE B AND C ANKLE FRACTURES



Abstract

Aims: We aimed to evaluate diagnostic contribution of MRI-Arthrography in syndesmosis disruption at ankle fractures. Methods: 18 patient who had Denis Weber type B-C fractures and are suspected to have syndesmotic diastasis considering tibiofibular clear space and tibiofibular overlap measurments in conventional radiographs are assesed with MRI followed by MRI-Arthrography. Because joint fluid was already seen in tibiofibular space in 3 patients at MRI, MRI-Arthrography was performed for the remaining 15 patients. If there was a changes between the results obtained from MRI and the results obtained after MRI-arthrography was tested istatistically. Convantional radiographs, MRIs and MRI-Arthrographies were analysed by 2 independent observers and interobserver concordance was assesed. Following intraoperative observation and asssesment syndesmotic diastasis was treated considering radiographic and MRI-arthrographic results. Results: In 15 cases who were regarded to have syndesmotic diastasis according to conventional radiographies, 8 (53.3%) diastasis were confirmed with only MRI and 12 (80%) diastasis were confirmed with MRI arthrography. Following intraoperative assesment 13 (86.6%) cases were regarded to have diastasis and surgical intervention was performed for diastasis repair. In 2 (13.3%) cases surgical intervention for diastasis repair was not performed. If there was a change in decission after MRI and after MRI-arthrography is analysed with chi-square test between related groups. There were statistically significiant difference (p< 0.05) in these means. There is interobserver concordance in conventional radiographic, MRI-arthrographic assesments and in assesments for ATIF and PTIF seperately inMRI.(p< 0.001). Conclusion: These results suggest that conventional radiography and MRI is not sufficient in assesing syndesmosis and MRI-arthrography is important for diagnosis.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.