header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP IN PROSTHESIS RECONSTRUCTION AFTER PROXIMAL HUMERUS RESECTIONS



Abstract

Purpose of this study is to examine the long-term follow-up in prosthesis reconstruction after proximal humerus resections.

Material and methods From February 1975 to December 1990, 144 patients have been operated for a musculoskeletal tumor of the shoulder girdle with resection and reconstruction using a modular cemented prosthesis. The MRS prosthesis is assembled in three parts with a ball shaped rotating head stitched to the glenoid and acromium. Seventy patients died and 3 patients were lost to follow-up: 71 achieved a follow-up more than 10 years (123–259, av 175 mo). Age ranged from 9 to 73 years (mean 29.7). The resection was intrarticular in 44 cases, in 12 more the glenoid was resected along with the proximal humerus (extrarticular resection) and in 15 cases we performed a Tikhoff –Lindberg procedure.

Infection occurred in 7 patients (10%) from 1 to 144 months (median 12 mo): in 6 patients prosthesis removal was needed to achieve healing.

Mechanical complications were present in 19 patients (27%): 15 (21%) had prosthetic head instability (5 surgically treated), 2 breakage of the prosthetic stem and 2 prosthetic disassembly.

Results: A detailed roentgen graphic analysis has been developed to better define the long-term course of the cement bone interface. Only 3 aseptic stem loosening were detected at 1, 3 and 11 years (after a supercondylar fracture occurred 8 months before). Eighteen patients were reoperated (25%); in 4 cases with minor surgery. Failure of the system occurred in 11 cases (15%).

Conclusion: The long durability of this cemented prosthesis has been demonstrated with very few cases of stem loosening in the early follow-up time. The problem of a good prosthetic head suture is still under concerning particularly in Tikhoff-Lindberg procedure.

The abstracts were prepared by Eleni Koutsoukou. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Hellenic Association of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (HAOST), 20, A. Fleming str, 15123 Marousi, Athens, Greece.