header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE FEMORAL STEM WITHOUT AND WITH HYDROXYAPATITE (HA) COVER IN PRIMARY CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS (THRS)



Abstract

100 randomized primary cementless THRs in 80 patients were reviewed retrospectively regarding the HA cover of the stem which was Waldemar Link’s, ribbed type, made of Titanium, with a collar and mostly applied without the trochanteric screw. The femoral neck was always retained high as possible. Full weight bearing on the operated leg started the 3rd postoperative day, while years earlier the 6th postoperative week. Two more or less, equal groups were formed: (A) without, (B) with HA covered stems and two subgroups: patients of 60 to70 years and 70 to 80 years. Gender was matched as possible and mean follow-up time was 8 years (range 7 to IO years). The Harris Hip Score was used for clinical evaluation and the method of “pencil and ruler” in plain X- Rays for radiographical one. Patients who died after the 8th postoperative year of evaluation were included.

Results

1, The postoperative hip score was at average for group (A) 92.1 points and for gr. (B) 92,4p.

2. In gr. (A) we found* at a rate 70% 2mm of symptom less, adaptive, slow early migration, while in gr. (B) this corresponded to 1 mm of same migration at a rate 60%. In both groups migration stopped by the second postoperative year.

3. “Alarming” stem migration was found in two cases: one in each group. The cause was that the stems applied, were undersized and the patients were women on menopausal osteoporosis. Both sterns were revised. Two more “alarming” stem migrations were found, one in each group, in patients suffering from collagenosis with the relevant bone quality. This migration was related to bone retreat primarily and irrelevant to stem’s loosening, gender or age of patients. Both stems have not been revised yet.

4. Similar and minimal-2% for gr. (A) vs 4% for gr. (B)- was the rate of symptomless, limited, non-sclerotic of less than 2mm wide demarcations gradually resolving, 5. Similar and minimal-2% for gr. (A) vs 5% for gr (B)- was the rate of stress shielding phenomenon resolving in 2 years time.

6. No further mechanical or biological loosening were noticed at mid-term results

7. Similar- 20% for gr (A) vs 15% for gr (B) was the rate of mild symptomless ectopic ossifications.

Conclusions: No significant differences were found at mid-term results between the two groups, the one without (A) and the other (B) with HA covered sterns. In case a stem happens to be undersized not securing primary fixation or in case the bone’s quality is not promising mechanical and biological fixation of the stem, then the presence of HA cover will not prevent the stem from “alarming” migration. Though we are still using successfully the cementless stem for patients over 70 years of age, when ever dealing with such quality of bone as with collagenosis then it would be wise to consider the use of the cement and even so reservations must exist.

The abstracts were prepared by Eleni Koutsoukou. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Hellenic Association of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (HAOST), 20, A. Fleming str, 15123 Marousi, Athens, Greece.