header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PERI-ACETABULAR ROTATIONAL OSTEOTOMY: THE STOKE EXPERIENCE



Abstract

Introduction: Peri-acetabular rotational osteotomy is recognized as the non-arthroplastic treatment for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH). This procedure has increased in popularity during the last decade. It aims to restore the acetabular cover over the femoral head and thus delay secondary osteoarthritic changes in the hip.

Materials and methods: We reviewed 16 patients who underwent peri-acetabular rotational surgery at our hospital. The indication for surgery was DDH in all cases. Reinert’s approach was used for surgical exposure. Two patients underwent a valgus femoral osteotomy at the same time. Mean age was 40 years (range 15–49). The mean follow-up was 46.5 months (range 4–108). The results of the surgery were assessed with radiological indices and a patient satisfaction survey. The radiological indices recorded were Wiberg’s angle, acetabular inclination angle, femoral head extrusion index and Tonnis osteoarthritis grading.

Results: The intervention failed to benefit two patients who subsequently required a total hip arthroplasty. Both patients had Tonnis grade 3 osteoarthritis. One patient developed a necrotic skin flap requiring skin grafting. The mean pre-operative Wiberg’s angle was 11 degrees (range −7 to 25) which was corrected to 35 degrees (range 17 to 58). Mean pre-operative acetabular index was 25 degrees (range 14 to 40) which was corrected to 11 degrees (range of 2 to 21). Mean pre-operative femoral head extrusion index was 37 degrees (range 18–50) which was reduced to 14 degrees (range 0–32). In all but the two patients in whom the surgery had failed, patients reported reduction in hip pain.

Conclusions: Peri-acetabular rotational osteotomy is a challenging but worthwhile procedure for young patients with DDH. The early results from the procedure are encouraging providing patient selection is appropriate. We would like to initiate a debate to identify the ideal patient for this procedure.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Mr Peter Kay. Correspondence should be address to him at The Hip Centre, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire WN6 9EP.