header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MODALITIES FOR REVISION OF ALUMINA-ON-ALUMINA TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: 6-YEAR RESULTS



Abstract

Purpose: During revision of alumina-on-alumina prostheses, reimplantation of a ceramic head on the former stem raises the risk of head fracture. Furthermore, serious deformation of the metal head has been reported after failure of ceramic-on-ceramic prostheses. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the incidence of these complications and analyse clinical and radiological results of revision for alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties.

Material and methods: This consectutive series included 107 patients (74 women and 33 men, mean age 65 years, age range 32–91 years) who underwent 118 revision arthroplasties from 1976 to 1997. The cause in the majority of the cases was isolated non-infected cup loosening (80%) or ceramic implant fracture (4%). There were 72 cemented alumina cups, 38 screwed cups, six press-fit metal-backed cups, and two massive alumina impacted cups. Cavitary acetabular osteolysis was present in 67% of the cases. The cup was replaced alone in 94 cases (80%). The implanted cup was a polyethylene cup in 93 cases and an alumina cup in 25. When the femoral stem was left in place, a new ceramic head was implanted in 49 cases (39 alumina, 10 zircone). The alumina head was replaced by a metal head in 18 cases.

Results: Four early dislocations and two infections were noted. Mean follow-up after revision surgery was 67 months. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up. Sixteen patients required revision surgery, ten of them for repeated cup loosening. At last follow-up (mean 61 months), there were no failures among the 49 ceramic heads implanted on a stem left in place. No revisions were required for polyethylene cup wear or metal head wear. In all, 72 hips were evaluated at a minimum two years follow-up. The functional score at last follow-up was 15.2±3.5. Seven-year actuarial survival was 95.5% taking revision of non-infected revision as the endpoint.

Discussion and conclusion: Analysis of the results shows that acetabular loosening is the main cause of revision of alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties. The femoral stem was loosened in only nine cases and could be preserved in 80% of the cases. Replacement of an alumina-on-alumina couple with a metal-on-polyethylene couple does not appear to be a contraindication in this series.

The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.