header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DISMOUNTED OSTEOSYNTHESIS MATERIAL IMPLANTED FOR PERTROCHANTERIC AND SUBTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 16 CASES



Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse mechanical failures involving dismonted osteosynthesis materials implanted to fix pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures with a dynamic hip screw (DHS), a Gamma nail, or a plate nail system (STACA).

Material and methods: Our cohort included 16 patients among a series of 350 patients who had been treated with 240 DHS, 80 Staca nailplates, and 30 Gamma nails between 1996 and 1999. We used the Ender classification for the x-ray analysis and the Cuny criteria which describe the most common causes of dismounted material.

Results: According to the defined criteria, 70/350 osteosynthesis assemblies (20%) were considered insufficient on the immediate postoperative x-rays and eventually dismounted in 16 patients. Two of these patients had major osteopaenia according to the Singh criteria and ten underwent revision because of poor clinical tolerance. These patients had six DHS (3 “swinging” cervical nails, two dismounted plates, and one screw protruding into the joint space). A protruding screw was the problem for the eight Staca nail-plates. Two Gamma nails had a “swinging” screw. These cases of dismounted material were predominantly observed in patients with Ender grade 5, 7 and 8 pertrochanteric fractures.

Discussion: Our analysis of these cases revealed several important factors: 1) the quality of the fracture reduction with restitution of the medial pillar of the per-trochanteric mass; 2) central anchoring in the femoral head essential for stable fixation; 3) superior stability of the DHS in grade 1 and 6 fractures due to the greater projected surface improving hold in cancellous bone. Inversely, for subtrochanteric fractures (grade 7 and 8), centromedulary shaft anchoring with a Gamma nail reduces mechanical stress in varus and thus the risk of “swinging” screws. Finally, the monoblock construct of the Staca nail-plate, which does not have the dynamic potential of the DHS and the Gamma nail, raises a risk of protrusion, particularly in case of “internal rotation” fractures with major metaphyseal comminution (grades 4 and 5). This latter type of fixation is however very effective for simple pertrochanteric fractures with minimal comminution (grades 1 to 3).

Conclusion: Material dismounting results from a series of factors related both to the material used and to the operative technique. We thus reserve the Staca nail-plate for grade 1 to 3 fractures in the Ender classification, the DHS for grades 1 to 6 and the nail-screw fixation for subtrochanteric (grade 7 and 8) fractures.

The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.