Abstract
Purpose: Fractures involving both the shaft of the femur and the proximal portion of the femur are uncommon. In a meta-analysis of cases reported between 1951 and 1985, Alho recorded 659 cases where a wide range of management strategies were used. We report here a homogeneous series of 17 patients treated with ascending locked anterograde nailing.
Material: This series of 17 patients were young (mean age 36 years). These eleven men and six women were all victims of high-energy trauma; 12 had multiple fractures. The shaft fracture involved the middle third in 15 patients, the lower third in two; the shaft fracture was open in six cases. The proximal fracture was transcervical in nine patients (7 B21, 1 B22, 1 B23) and trochanteric in six (A A32, 1 A31, 2 A12, 2 A33).
Methods: The fracture was reduced under fluorescent guidance on the orthopaedic table in the supine position followed by anterograde nailing with ascending proximal locking in the axis of the neck using a Russel and Taylor reconstruction nail. The osteosynthesis was performed on day 0 in eleven patients, during the first week in three and later in three.
Results: Results are reported for 17 patients. There was one early superficial suppuration which healed favourable after local care. Two shaft fractures exhibited nonunion and were revised to decorticalise the graft. The cervical fracture exhibited early displacement in one patient who underwent revision on day 15; bone healing did not ensue and a total hip arthroplasty was implanted at ten months. All the other fractures healed within three to five months after the first-intention treatment. The long-term follow-up has revealed one case of cephalic necrosis at five years which has required a total hip arthroplasty.
Discussion: These double fractures involving the proximal femur and the shaft of the femur account for 1 to 5% of the femur fractures reported in the literature. They are observed in young victims of high-energy trauma, often associated with other multiple injuries. Diagnosis is not always easy to establish since there may be little or no displacement of the proximal fracture, which may be recognised secondarily after standard nailing (2 out of 17 cases).
The trochanteric fractures are generally easier to diagnose and reduce, and usually heal well. The shaft fractures are more often displaced and readily comminutive, sometimes open, having absorbed the greater part of the trauma energy. These fractures heal like ordinary shaft fractures. Neck fractures are often seen in the lower portion with a vertical fracture line, with or without displacement.
Using a single centromedullary nail for the osteosynthesis of both fractures is an attractive solution. The proximal fracture must however be carefully reduced with percutaneous pins before attempting nail insertion. The postoperative period is generally uneventful. Problems may be encountered if the cervical fracture cannot be perfectly reduced, in which case two separate fixations would be preferable.
The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.
