Abstract
This comparative clinical and radiographic study evaluates the role of implant design and positioning on maximum postoperative flexion after TKR.
Two groups of cemented posterostabilised mobile prosthesis were studied. In group A (23 cases) bearing mobility was possible in rotation and translation. In group B (36 cases) solely rotation was possible and the radius of the posterior femoral condyle was larger. In both groups the same medial transquadricipital approach was used and the postoperative rehabilitation was identical.
There were no significant difference between the two groups for patient age, sex, weight and etiology. The average preoperative flexion was 120.8° in group A and 120.7° in group B. The average postoperative flexion at one year was 114.8° in group A and 130.4° in group B. Instability was noted twice in group A and none in group B. Radiographically there was no difference in mechanical axis or patellar height. There was a difference in joint line elevation and anteroposterior joint size.
Higher flexion angle may be related to smaller antero-posterior joint size, better posterior osteophytes removal and larger posterior femoral condyle radius. Greater stability correlates with greater jumping distance over the tibial post. This study showed that deep flexion can be achieved in some patients after TKR, with implications on surgical technique and implant design.
The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdoschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Orthopaedie / CSS1, Huispost 800, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Th. Craanenlaan 7, 6525 GH Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
