header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

INTERACTION BETWEEN ACETABULAR LINER DESIGN, HIP STABILITY, RANGE OF MOTION, AND POLYETHYLENE CONTACT STRESSES AFTER HIP ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

Polyethylene contact stresses have been shown to correlate with wear in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several liner designs have been introduced in an attempt to increase stability or reduce impingement and increase range of motion. This study analyzed the effect of liner design on range of motion (ROM) and PE contact stresses in a finite element model (FEM).

FEMs of four liner designs were generated: Generic was modelled as a simple hemisphere, Chamfer had a wide chamfer on the inner edge of the liner to increase ROM, Highwall had an extended lip to increase stability, and Anteverted created a 20° anteversion with lat-eralisation of the centre of rotation. With the liners in varying positions of abduction and anteversion, physiologic loads were applied through the femoral head. Hip ROM was measured by rotating the head and neck in different directions until prosthetic impingement.

Significant differences in ROM were seen relative to the Generic liner. Chamfer increased ROM by mean 16%. Highwall reduced ROM by mean 12%. Anteverted increased flexion by 17% but decreased extension, abduction, and external rotation. Contact stresses were also significantly affected by liner design and acetabular orientation. Overall for the same acetabular position, contact stresses were higher for Chamfer and lower for Highwall and Anteverted.

These results underline the complex interaction between cup design, hip stability, range of motion and contact stresses. Design features that increase stability tend to reduce contact stresses and ROM, while those features that increase ROM, tend to increase contact stresses. This data can help the surgeon match liner design to specific patient requirements.

The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdoschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Orthopaedie / CSS1, Huispost 800, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Th. Craanenlaan 7, 6525 GH Nijmegen, The Netherlands.