header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A COMPARISON OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND MRI FINDINGS IN OSTEOCHONDRITIS DISSECANS OF THE TALUS



Abstract

Introduction

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a localised disorder of subchondral bone and the overlying articular cartilage. The most commonly used classification systems involve arthroscopy and MRI.

Aim

To investigate the correlation between arthroscopic and MR findings in patients with OCD of the talus.

Methods

16 ankles in 14 patients with radiographically proven OCD were reviewed. Nine were male and five female. Mean age was 35yrs (range 18–64yrs). The lesions were staged independently using the Guhl1 arthroscopic and Dipaola2 MR classification systems.

Results

Arthroscopically there were eight stable and eight unstable lesions. Of the eight stable lesions, MRI staged five as stable and three as unstable. Of the eight unstable lesions, MRI staged six as unstable and two as stable. This gives a sensitivity of diagnosing unstable lesions as 0.75, with a specificity of 0.63.

Conclusions

This small study demonstrates that MR scans may have some limitations in classifying OCD lesions of the talus. Possible explanations are discussed. We propose that MRI findings, of OCD of the talus, should not be taken in isolation, but correlated with the patients symptoms and signs to avoid unnecessary arthroscopy.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr J. L. Barrie. Correspondence should be addressed to Mr J. L. Barrie, BOFSS Editor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Blackburn Royal Infirmary, Blackburn, Lancashire BB2 3LR.

(1) Guhl JF. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondritis dissecans. Clin Orthop (167)65–74,1982 Google Scholar

(2) DiPaola J, Nelson DW, Colville M. Characterising osteochondral lesions by magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy (7)101–4,1991 Google Scholar