header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR WOUND COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING FREE AND PEDICLED SOFT TISSUE FLAPS RECONSTRUCTION AFTER EXCISION OF SOFT TISSUE TUMOURS



Abstract

113 consecutive patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated by excision and reconstructive flaps were studied to assess the risk of complications and to compare local tumour control with those in whom primary wound closure was possible.

Minimum follow-up was 24 months and mean age was 55 years (16–95). The sarcoma was located in the lower extremity in 83 and upper extremity 30 patients. Significant wound complications developed in 37 patients (33%). The most common complications were wound infections or partial necrosis occurring in 16% (18/113) and 13% (15/113) respectively. Complete flap necrosis requiring flap removal occurred in 6 patients (5%). Three patients (2.3%) required amputation as a result of complications. Significant risk factors for development of wound complications include location of tumour in the lower limb compared to upper limb (relative risk 2.3, p=0.02) and use of pre-operative radiotherapy compared to no or post-operative radiotherapy (relative risk 2.05, p=0.02). There was no difference in rates of complications in patients with free or pedicled flaps, tumours < or > 5cm, distal or proximal location of tumour.

The rates of negative excision margins (80%) and wound complications in patients who required reconstructive flaps were not different from that for the other patients treated at our centre who did not require reconstructive flaps.

The use of soft tissue reconstructive flaps did not reduce the risk of positive excision margins or the rates of wound complications. The risk of amputation secondary to flap complication or failure is low.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Richard Buxton. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Bankton Cottage, 21 Bankton Park, Kingskettle, Cupar, Fife KY15 7PY, United Kingdom