header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

BIOFILMS AND CEMENT TO LOAD OR UNLOAD?



Abstract

Cement is still in common usage in primary and revision arthroplasty surgery. Infection rates in cemented arthroplasties ranges from 1–4% and poses a huge problem for the revision arthroplasty surgeon. Infection in septic implants is biofilm based and almost completely resistant to conventional anti-microbial therapy. Recent papers have questioned the efficacy of using gentamicin-loaded cement in arthroplasty as staphylococcus aureus biofilms will develop on same. The focus of this study was to investigate the efficacy of antibiotic loaded cement in preventing initial bacterial adhesion and subsequent development of a bacterial biofilm in vitro.

Three cements Simplex unloaded, Simplex with erythromycin and Simplex with tobramycin were mixed in a conventional manner, ie vacuum hand mixing in sterile conditions and then injected into pre-moulded PTFE coated cylinder moulds yielding 8 cylinders in each group. The cement cylinders were then removed and exposed to a known pathogenic strain of staphylococcus aureus ATCC—29213-NCTC 12973 in solution 3x106 Colony forming units CFH/ml) for 15 minutes. The cylinders were then removed and cultured for 24 hours at 37°C in RPMI with Glutamine. Cylinders were then removed and subjected to rinsing in PBS to remove any non-adherent bacteria. Cylinders were then sonicated at 50 Hz in Ringer’s solution and adherent biofilms were serially log diluted and plated on Columbia blood agar. Colonies were counted manually. Control cylinders of unloaded cement showed 120,000 CFU/cm2 of adherent bacteria whereas loaded cement erythromycin and tobramycin showed 500 and 80 CFU/cm2 respectively (p< .0005 Student t-test).

This study shows that loaded cement does not prevent biofilm adhesion in its initial reversible stages whereas unloaded cement does not. This is important since most infected implants are infected at time of primary operation and cements anti-bacterial role beyond the first 48 hours remains questionable, when inflammatory encapsulation of the implant begins. We would therefore question the usage of unloaded cement in primary arthroplasty surgery.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Ray Moran. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Irish Orthopaedic Associaton, Secretariat, c/o Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 11.