header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

REVIEW OF 79 INFECTED KNEE REPLACEMENTS



Abstract

A knowledge of bacteriological profiles in previously treated cases is helpful as a guide to management of infected joint replacements, especially in those cases where bacteriology results are not available. The object of this study was to assess the changing trends of the bacteriology of infected total knee replacements (TKR) over 2 decades.

The records of 79 patients undergoing revision for infected TKR between 1979 and 1999 were reviewed. There were 30 males and 49 females, average age 63 years, range 36 – 82 years. The types and sensitivities of bacteria identified, and the use of prophylactic systematic and cement antibiotics, was recorded. The Chi-squared test was used to test statistical significance.

70 organisms were identified in 62 patients: 29 Staphylococcus aureus; 27 Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CNS); 8 Streptococci; 6 Coliforms. In the 1980s S. aureus accounted for 55% of infections, CNS 25%. In the 1990s S. aureus 38%, CNS 41%. Following the use of systematic antibiotics (3 x cefuroxime) or antibiotic cement (bacitracin/erythromycin/colistin – BEC) at primary TKR, fewer CNS infections were seen (p< 0. 05). There was only 1 case of methicillin resistant S. aureus. Coagulase negative staphylococci had a 36% resistance to flucloxacillin. With BEC cement there was a tendency to increased erythromycin resistance in CNS, but this did not achieve statistical significance.

At revision for infected TKR, different bacterial profiles were observed depending on prophylactic antibiotic usage. As CNS now causes > 40% of infections, patients undergoing revision TKR should have antibiotics effective against CNS until definitive results are available.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom