header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE ACROFLEX LUMBAR DISC REPLACEMENT: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY WITH TWO YEAR FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

A prospective study to evaluate the design, outcome and complications of the AcroFlex titanium/polyolefin artificial lumbar disc replacement.

11 subjects with single-level discographically proven discogenic pain of at least six months duration and refractory to conservative treatment underwent Total Disc Replacement (TDR) using the AcroFlex TDR. Surgery was performed by an anterior retroperitoneal approach. The following outcome measures were recorded pre-operatively, at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months: Visual Analogue Score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS), and SF-36. Physical examination and radiological assessment (plain radiographs, flexion/extension views, cine-radiography) were performed at the same time intervals. Complications and reoperations were recorded.

11 patients were enrolled since April 1998 (7 male / 4 female). The mean age was 41. 3 years. All patients have been followed for a minimum of two years.

Surgery averaged 136 minutes with 143 mls blood loss. There were no operative complications. The average length of stay was 6. 1 days. The mean VAS reduced from 8. 8 to 4. 4 at two years. ODI improved from 51. 3 (mean) to 20. 9 (mean) at 24 months. The mean LBOS of 18. 4 improved to 47. 3 at two years.

Patients showed improvement in all subsets of the SF-36. Radiological examination confirmed a mean flexion/extension arc of 6. 6 degrees with restoration of native disc height. Adverse events included one disc expulsion (under radiological observation), one autofusion (F/E views still confirm movement) and one catastrophic rubber failure requiring revision to combined anterior/posterior interbody fusion. As a result of this case all patients underwent ultra fine cut CT scans. An additional 4 cases showed small anterior tears in the rubber and are currently asymptomatic.

The two-year outcome of the AcroFlex TDR is reported in 11 patients. Improvements in VAS, ODI, LBOS and all domains of the SF-36 were reported by 10 of 11 patients. Radiological outcome confirmed preservation of movement and restoration of disc height. Adverse events including disc expulsion, autofusion and rubber failure demand continued vigilance.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom