THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY

C. Wigfield; S. Gill; R. Nelson; N. Metcalf; J. Robertson

doi:10.1302/0301-620X.84BSUPP_III.0840335e

Article alerts Social media

Current issue

THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY

C. Wigfield
S. Gill
R. Nelson
N. Metcalf
J. Robertson

THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY

Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, Metcalf N, Robertson J. THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY. Orthop Procs. 2002;84-B(SUPP_III):335-335. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.84BSUPP_III.0840335e

Wigfield, C., et al. “THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY.” Orthopaedic Proceedings, vol. 84-B, no. SUPP_III, 2002, pp. 335-335., https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84BSUPP_III.0840335e

Wigfield, C., Gill, S., Nelson, R., Metcalf, N., & Robertson, J. (2002). THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY. Orthopaedic Proceedings, 84-B(SUPP_III), 335-335. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84BSUPP_III.0840335e

Wigfield, C., Gill, S., Nelson, R., Metcalf, N. and Robertson, J. (2002) “THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY.” Orthopaedic Proceedings, 84-B(SUPP_III), pp. 335-335. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84BSUPP_III.0840335e

Wigfield, C., S. Gill, R. Nelson, N. Metcalf, and J. Robertson. “THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY.” Orthopaedic Proceedings 84-B, no. SUPP_III (2002): 335-335. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84BSUPP_III.0840335e

Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, Metcalf N, Robertson J. THE NEW FRENCHAY ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL JOINT: RESULTS AT TWO YEARS OF A PILOT STUDY. Orthop Procs. 2002 Nov 1;84-B(SUPP_III):335-335. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84BSUPP_III.0840335e

Copy to clipboard

BibTeX

EndNote

RIS

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety, clinical stability and capacity to preserve motion in the cervical spine of a newly designed cervical intervertebral disc replacement for patients with degenerative disc disease.

Design: A prospective cohort pilot study.

Subjects: Fifteen patients considered to be at risk of developing adjacent level degenerative changes received the artificial joint. Patients had either radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with radiological evidence of compression.

Outcome Measures: Radiological evidence of stability of the device and preservation of motion at the operated level and adverse events associated with the procedure. Secondary outcome measures were changes in scores on SF-36, Neck Disability Index, European Myelopathy Score and Visual Analogue Pain Scale assessments.

Results: The artificial joint maintained motion at the operated in all patients. The procedure was considered safe to be performed by experienced spine surgeons. The device was stable with no dislocation of components or backing out of screws. Improvements were noted in all of the assessment scores though statistical significance was not achieved.

Conclusions: Cervical intervertebral motion can be maintained with this device which at two years is clinically stable. The long-term influence of this device remains unknown.

Abstracts prepared by Mr. A. J. Stirling, FRCS, and Miss A. Weaver. Correspondence should be addressed to Miss A. Weaver at the Research and Teaching Centre, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Northfield, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK

BritSpine 2002, the second combined meeting of the British Association of Spinal Surgeons, the British Cervical Spine Society, The British Scoliosis Society and the Society for Back Pain Research, took place at the International Convention Centre in Birmingham UK between 27^th February and 1^st March 2002. The following presentations and posters were given and displayed.