Abstract
Aim: We conducted a prospective, randomised study of 50 patients, 40 (80%) male and 10 (20%) female, with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture to compare the results of ligament reconstruction by middle third patellar tendon graft (M) or synthetic Leeds-Keio (LK) ligament.
Method: The patients were randomised into two groups. 26 (52%) underwent PTG repair and 24 (48%) LK repair. Subjective knee function was classified using the Lysholm score, Tegner activity score and IKDC grading. Laxity was tested by clinical examination including anterior draw, pivot shift and arthrometric measurements using the Stryker Laxometer (Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA).
Results: We present the early (two to five-year follow-up) results of this on-going trial. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in activity levels, both pre-injury and current. However, both pivot shift and anterior laxity were significantly greater in the LK group at two years and greater.
Discussion: While the LK group did develop significantly greater laxity, it is demonstrated that the functional outcome is not affected. We conclude therefore that if the results of surgery were to be based on a functional outcome rather than objective measurements of laxity, it would seem logical that the LK is an acceptable alternative to autogenous PTG.
However whilst function appears to be as good the less successful objective criteria do suggest reservations for the long term results of the Leeds-keio graft.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Roger Smith. Correspondence should be addressed to him care of the British Orthopaedic Association, Royal College of Surgeons, 35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN.
