header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

STRAIN GAUGE ANALYSIS OF A PROXIMAL FIT AND FILL TITANIUM, CEMENTLESS, FEMORAL HIP PROSTHESIS



Abstract

Introduction: Proximal bone resorption is a common problem after total hip arthroplasty. This has been attributed to stress shielding and has been reported to be more pronounced for cemented than for uncemented implants.

Aim: To investigate the cortical strain distribution of a new proximal “fit and fill” cementless, titanium, femoral, hip prosthesis based on the SROM design.

Methods: Strain gauges were mounted on five fresh-frozen cadaveric and five saw-bone femora and checked against a template for the prosthesis. The strain gauges were placed at four levels on the anterior, posterior, medial and lateral cortices corresponding to the Gruen zones. Two extra strain gauges were placed on the proximal posteromedial cortex. Loading was applied to the intact and reconstructed femora in the ISO 7206–4 orientation and single legged stance in an MTS servo-hydraulic testing machine. Data were analysed using analysis of variance.

Results: The strain distributions following reconstruction and multi-axis loading (ISO 7206–4 orientation) approximated the strains in an intact femur in the diaphysis. The proximal posteromedial cortical strains were approximately 50% of those of the intact femur.

Conclusions: The strains observed in the proximal femur following reconstruction in the present study are considerably higher than most others reported in the literature. A number of factors may contribute to the high proximal strains observed. This study has illustrated that geometric design and material selection along with surgical technique may allow for greater loading to proximal bone and enhance the long term integrity of this type of implant.

The abstracts were prepared by Professor A. J. Thurston. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Surgery, Wellington School of Medicine, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, New Zealand