header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF TENDON FIXATION IN A MODEL OF DISTAL BICEPS TENDON AVULSION



Abstract

Distal biceps tendon avulsion requires surgical treatment but is uncommon. The average orthopedic surgeon will come across a case only occasionally. The two-incision technique of Boyd is technically difficult. One-incision methods are easier for the occasional surgeon. Methods using Mitek Bone Anchors and Endobuttons have been described in the literature. This presentation compares those techniques and a technique using anterior cruciate interference screws against the Two Incision Technique in a model consisting of sheep bone and sash cord.

The models were then tested on a dynamometer to failure to assess the ultimate strength of the various methods of fixation. In this model Mitek Anchors and Endobuttons gave comparable fail points to the two Incision Technique. The Interference Screw Technique was stronger.

The abstracts were prepared by Professor Jegan Krishnan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 5047, Australia.