Abstract
Introduction: Dysfunction of the patellofemoral mechanism presents as patella dislocation or subluxation with or without anterior knee pain. Causes are numerous and include ligamentous deficiency, muscular deficiency, anomlies of bony alignment and patellofemoral joint abnormalities. The 130 different procedures described to treat this condition reflect the multiple pathologies responsible. No single procedure has gained widespread acceptance. We present a surgical technique that attempts to correct as many of these deficiencies of the patellofemoral mechanism as possible.
Method: The procedure consists of a lateral release, a vastus medialis tendon advancement and a tibial tubercle osteotomy. The ‘Q’ angle is corrected by medialisation of the tubercle, patella alta is corrected by a distalisation technique and joint reaction forces through the patellofemoral joint are reduced by placing the tibial tuberosity in a more anterior position.
100 patients who have undergone this procedure have been identified. 81 percent initially presented with patella subluxation or dislocation. The remainder complained of anterior knee pain with evidence of abnormal patella tracking on examination. 52 percent of our patients had undergone at least one previous patellofemoral realignment procedure which had failed. 43 percent of the patients had generalised ligamentous laxity.
Results: The mean follow-up was 2.6 years from the index operation. 81 percent of the patients stated the operation had improved or abolished their symptoms. Generalised ligamentous laxity was present in the remaining 19 percent and seemed to correlate with a poor outcome. 66 percent of patients stated they were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery. Two patients developed recurrent subluxation after surgery and one of these has undergone a revision distal realignment procedure.
Using the functional category described by Crosby and Insall for patellofemoral symptoms 66 percent had a good-to-excellent outcome, 23 percent had a fair outcome and 10 percent of the patients stated they were worse following the procedure with increased anterior knee pain. 100 percent of these patients had grade 3 or 4 cartilage defects on retropatella surface. 57% of patients returned to sporting activity. 14% of the remainder had not returned to sporting activity because of persisting symptoms in the knee.
57 percent of patients had lost a mean 12.5 degrees of flexion of the knee at follow-up [range 5–30]. 5 percent of patients developed minor complications following surgery. No radiological deterioration was seen in any patients although coexistent patellofemoral osteoarthritis was seen in 25 percent of patients. There was no loss of fixation in any of the patients.
Discussion: A multifaceted approach to the complex problem of patellofemoral dysfunction appears to achieve satisfactory functional results in patients even when previous surgical realignment has failed. The procedure appears to be associated with low morbidity although a loss of flexion of the knee is to be expected. Generalised ligamentous laxity and cartilage defects on the retropatella surface appear to be associated with poor results and anterior knee pain in the absence of instability may be a cause for persisting symptoms.
The abstracts were prepared by Professor Jegan Krishnan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 5047, Australia.
