header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE CLINICAL TRIAL OF AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION VERSUS MOSAICPLASTY



Abstract

Many methods have been described over the past 5 years for repair of articular cartilage defects. The best reported results have been from the use of autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT)(1) and mosaicplasty.(2) There have, however, been no prospective clinical trials of these two methods. In this trial 70 patients were prospectively randomized to receive either autologous chondrocyte transplantation (37) or mosaicplasty (33) in the knee. 37 patients were female and 33 male. The average age was 32 years (16 – 44). The indications for surgery were persistent pain and mechanical symptoms in the knee with an isolated defect of the articular cartilage. 38 (56%) were post-traumatic, 12 (16%) due to osteochondritis dissecans, 10 (14%) due to previous meniscectomy, and 10 (14%) due to chondromalacia patellae. The size of the defects ranged from 2cm2 to 12cm2 (mean 4.8cm2). There were 35 defects on the medial femoral condyle, 13 on the lateral femoral condyle, 17 on the patella and 5 on the trochlear. 31 patients were undergoing primary surgery and 39 secondary surgery. All were independently reviewed using the Visual Analogue Pain Score, the Cincinatti Pain Score and the Stanmore Score. Patients were arthroscoped at one year with MRI scan and biopsies where possible.

Results: The visual analogue pain score improved overall from a mean of 5.4 (range 3.4 – 7.4) pre-operatively to 3.9 (1.8 – 5.1) at one year review. Similarly the Cincinatti pain score improved from 6.5 pre-operatively to 10.2 post-operatively and the Cincinatti function score improved from 46 to 62 at one year before sport commenced. Overall 71% (49) patients were excellent or good on the clinical scoring scales, 15% (11) were fair, and 14% (10) were poor. The 10 poor results were no different from the main group with regard to age, sex, pain level or site or size of lesion. However, 5 were secondary procedures, 2 had multiple lesions, and 3 had had previous ruptured anterior cruciate ligaments. Arthroscopy and biopsy of 21 lesions so far after one year has shown mature articular cartilage in 2, and immature cartilage in 19. In all cases there was bonding of the repair tissue to the underlying bone. This study is already clarifying the role of ACT and mosaicplasty in the management of cartilage defects in the knee and also the necessity for the use of periosteal covering membrane.

The abstracts were prepared by Professor Jegan Krishnan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 5047, Australia.