header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

CEMENTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING A FOURTH GENERATION CEMENT TECHNIQUE AND POLISHED FEMORAL PROSTHESIS



Abstract

To evaluate the results critically of cemented total hip arthroplasty using a fourth generation cement technique and polished femoral stem, a prospective study was performed in patients under 50 years of age who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. 55 patients (64 hips) were enrolled in the study (43 were male and 12 were female). Average age of patients was 43.4 years (21–50 years). Elite plus stems (DePuy, Leeds, UK) were cemented and cementless Duraloc cups (DePuy, Warsaw, IN.) were implanted in all hips. 22 mm zirconia femoral head (DePuy, Leeds UK) was used in all hips. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon (YHK). The diagnosis was osteonecrosis (43 hips or 67%), osteoarthritis (5 hips or 4%), O.A. 2° to childhood T.B. or pyogenic arthritis (4 hips or 6%), R.A, (3 hips or 5%), DDH (2 hips or 3%) and others (7 hips or 11%). The average F.U. was 7.2 years (6–8 years). The 4th generation cement technique was utilized including: medullary plug, pulsatile lavage, vaccum mixing of Simplex P cement; cement gun, distal centralizer and proximal rubber seal to pressurize cement. Thigh pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (10 points). Clinical (Harris hip score) and x-ray follow-up was performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and then annually. Cementing technique was graded. Abductor moment arm, femoral offset, neck and limb length, center of rotation of hips, cup angle and anteversion were measured in all hips. Linear and volumetric wear were measured by software program. Osteolysis was identified. There was no aseptic loosening or subsidence of components. One hip was revised due to late infection. Incidence of thigh pain was 11% (7 hips). All thigh pain disappeared at 1 year postoperatively. Preoperative Harris hip score was 47.2 (7–67) points and 92.2 (81–100) points at the final F.U. Femoral cementing was classified as grade A in 50 hips (78%), grade B in 6 hips (9%), and grade C1 in 8 hips (13%). There was no cases in grades C2 and D. All bones had type A femoral bone. The average linear wear and annual rate were 1.25 and 0.21 mm, respectively. The average volumetric wear was 473.48 mm3. There was statistically significant relationship between the liner wear, age (under 40), male patient, and the cup angle. Yet there was no statistical relationship between the wear and Dx., wt., hip score, R-O-M, anteversion, anbductor moment arm, femoral offset, neck and limb length and center of rotation of hip. Osteolysis was identified in zone 7A in 6 hips (9%). No hip had distal osteolysis. Advanced cementing technique, polished improved stem design, strong trabecular bone, and utilizing a smaller head and thick polys greatly improved the mid-term survival of the implants in these young patients. Good cementing technique eliminated distal osteolysis and markedly reduced the proximal osteolysis. Yet high linear and volumetric wear of polyethylene liner remains to be a challenging problem.

The abstracts were prepared by Professor Jegan Krishnan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 5047, Australia.