Abstract
The issue of preservation or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty remains unresolved.
We report the results of 200 consecutive total knee arthroplasties performed at our hospital under the direction of the senior author. Pre-operatively, patients were randomly chosen to receive either a Kinemax (posterior cruciate retaining) or a Press-Fit-Condylar (posterior cruciate sacrificing) prosthesis. We implanted 97 Kinemax and 103 Press-Fit-Condylar prostheses which were prospectively followed-up by clinical and radiographic assessment. Review at mean follow-up of 2.7 years showed a satisfactory clinical result in both groups [Surace, et al., 1994].
We present the results of our further review, with maximum follow-up of over nine years (mean: 5.9 years). Revision of the implant has been performed in five knees (three Kinemax and two Press-Fit-Condylar). The polythene spacer had to be replaced in one patient with a Press-Fit-Condylar implant.
Patients were assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score and radiologically assessed with the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System. Pre-operative demographics and disease states of the patients were similar, with an average Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score of 63. At the latest assessment the average knee score was good (85). Remarkably, the mean knee score for the posterior cruciate sacrifice and the PCL groups remains similar (mean: 85). Radiographic evaluation demonstrated that the prosthetic components of both groups were in comparable alignment. The posterior cruciate ligament retained (Kinemax) patient group showed a mean 5.9 degrees of the valgus angle at the knee. The angle in the posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice (PFC implant) group was 6.2 degrees. Evaluation of the radiolucent depths below the femoral, tibial and any patella component showed a mean total depth of 1.5 mm (pcl retaining) and 1.7 mm (pcl sacrificing).
Our study presents a quantitative perspective of the results of total knee replacement with proven implant systems and performed in a general orthopaedic unit by both consultants and surgeons in training. The Kinemax (Howmedica) and Press-Fit-Condylar (DePuy Johnson and Johnson) implant systems have both previously demonstrated good results and continue to be available with little subsequent modification.
To our knowledge, there have been no other large prospectively randomised studies of posterior cruciate ligament preservation or sacrifice in total knee replacement.
The abstracts were prepared by David P. Davlin. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Orthopedic Clinic Bulovka, Budínova 2, 18081 Prague 8, Czech Republic.
