header advert
You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to through either of these
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Get Access locked padlock

A comparison of Wilson and Hohmann osteotomies in the treatment of hallux valgus



Download PDF

Abstract

In a retrospective study we compared the results of 31 Wilson and 31 Hohmann osteotomies of the first metatarsal in the treatment of hallux valgus. There were no differences between the two operations in terms of patient satisfaction, pain relief, appearance, footwear and walking ability. First metatarsal shortening was the same after both operations, and the degree of shortening was unrelated to either the clinical or the pedobarographic findings. Although the long-term radiographic changes after the Hohmann osteotomy were more worrying, the pedobarographic patterns tended to be worse after the Wilson osteotomy. There were no poor results and the numbers of feet with the same final grade were identical in each group. However, there was abnormal loading of the lateral metatarsal heads after both osteotomies when compared with the normal foot, and hallux-contact time during the stance phase was also significantly reduced after osteotomy.

For access options please click here