header advert
You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to through either of these
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Get Access locked padlock

THE VASCULAR CONTRIBUTION TO OSTEOGENESIS

IV. The Effect of Pressure upon the Epiphysial Cartilage of the Rabbit



Download PDF

Abstract

From this work it may be concluded that persistent compression affects the growth plate by interference with the blood flow on one or both sides of the growth cartilage.

Despite exertion of the same pressure upon both sides of the growth plate, only the metaphysial side was readily affected in the early stages, for, as long as no damage was caused to the epiphysial side of the growth cartilage, the lesions were fully reversible.

Interference with growth was directly proportionate to the damage caused by compression to the epiphysial side of the growth plate and, in general, to the duration of compression.

The first signs of interference with the metaphysial side of the plate were the lack of vascular progression and concomitant retardation of calcification.

When severe degeneration was not present the growth cartilage recovered within four days.

The matrix was ready for calcification all the time, as shown by the extremely rapid calcification occurring soon after the compression had ceased and the vessels were able to reach their proper place.

It seems justified to believe that the first hypertrophic cell not to be calcified after removal of the clamp is the one around which the matrix has not yet changed sufficiently to have an affinity for the apatite crystals. As in moderate compression, the division of the proliferative cells continues and it seems it must be the age, or even more likely the distance from the transudate coming from the epiphysial side of the growth cartilage that conditions the maturity of the cell, which prepares the field for calcification and thus initiates the osteogenic process.

Views similar to this have been advanced by Ham (1957) and his school.

For access options please click here