header advert
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Open Access

Foot & Ankle

Effectiveness and safety of arthroscopy combined with radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy for osteochondritis of the talus: a prospective, single-centre, randomized, double-blind study



Download PDF

Abstract

Aims

Arthroscopic microfracture is a conventional form of treatment for patients with osteochondritis of the talus, involving an area of < 1.5 cm2. However, some patients have persistent pain and limitation of movement in the early postoperative period. No studies have investigated the combined treatment of microfracture and shortwave treatment in these patients. The aim of this prospective single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to compare the outcome in patients treated with arthroscopic microfracture combined with radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) and arthroscopic microfracture alone, in patients with ostechondritis of the talus.

Methods

Patients were randomly enrolled into two groups. At three weeks postoperatively, the rESWT group was given shockwave treatment, once every other day, for five treatments. In the control group the head of the device which delivered the treatment had no energy output. The two groups were evaluated before surgery and at six weeks and three, six and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. Secondary outcome measures included a visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain and the area of bone marrow oedema of the talus as identified on sagittal fat suppression sequence MRI scans.

Results

A total of 40 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into the two groups, with 20 in each. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the groups. No complications, such as wound infection or neurovascular injury, were found during follow-up of 12 months. The mean AOFAS scores in the rESWT group were significantly higher than those in the control group at three, six, and 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean VAS pain scores in the rESWT group were also significantly lower than those in the control group at these times (p < 0.05). The mean area of bone marrow oedema in the rESWT group was significantly smaller at six and 12 months than in the control group at these times (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Local shockwave therapy was safe and effective in patients with osteochondiritis of the talus who were treated with a combination of arthroscopic surgery and rESWT. Preliminary results showed that, compared with arthroscopic microfracture alone, those treated with arthroscopic microfracture combined with rESWT had better relief of pain at three months postoperatively and improved weightbearing and motor function of the ankle.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(10):1108–1114.

Take home message

This study is the first randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of arthroscopy combined with radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Compared with arthroscopy alone, arthroscopic microfracture combined with shockwave can better relieve local pain at three months after surgery, and improve the weightbearing and motor function of the ankle joint.

Most patients showed significant improvement in the bone marrow oedema area on MRI scans at 12 months after arthroscopy combined with rESWT.

Introduction

Various forms of treatment have been developed for the management of patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus, from conservative treatment to arthroscopic debridement and microfracture, mosaicplasty, and allograft or autologous chondrocyte implantation.1-5 For patients with mechanical symptoms after acute osteochondral lesions, or failed conservative treatment for three to six months, surgery should be performed. For lesions of < 15 mm in diameter or < 1.5 cm2 in area, arthroscopic microfracture is commonly performed.3,6-8 This stimulates the release of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from the subchondral bone to fill the defect and form fibrocartilage.3,6 Several studies have reported good mid-term clinical results in most patients.9-11 Early postoperative pain and abnormal MRI findings are, however, common, and the long-term outcomes are not known. New forms of treatment are thus needed to relieve pain and improve the motor function of the ankle.

Recent studies have shown that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) can induce neovascularization and stimulate the growth factors related to angiogenesis and osteogenesis.12,13 Good results have been reported when ESWT has been used in the management of delayed fracture healing, infectious nonunion, and osteochondral injuries.14-16 Lyon et al17 showed that ESWT accelerated the healing of early osteochondral lesions in rabbit models and improved the quality of cartilage and subchondral bone. Zhang et al18 recently showed that the use of ESWT relieved pain and improved the function of the ankle in patients with residual pain after arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Osteochondritis of the talus has been included as an indication for ESWT by the International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment since March 2008.19

In this study, patients with osteochondritis of the talus underwent arthroscopic debridement and microfracture combined with radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) to treat pain, increase the local blood supply, and promote chondrogenesis. To our knowledge, there has been no randomized controlled study dealing with this issue. The hypothesis was that, compared with arthroscopic debridement and microfracture alone, the combined technique would reduce pain and improve the function of the ankle, without notable complications.

Methods

A randomized, double-blind, single-centre, placebo-controlled trial was performed at the Centre of Joint Surgery of the Southwest Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. Two groups of patients were treated with arthroscopy and microfracture before enrolment, after which one group was given rESWT with energy output, and the control group was given sham shockwave treatment with no energy output.

Patients with osteochondritis of the talus (Hepple stages I to III)20 who were treated between 1 June 2017 and 31 May 2019 were considered. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged between 18 and 80 years, with symptoms for > three months and MRI scans showing Hepple stage I to III osteochondritis. The exclusion criteria were: patients of other ages; those with Hepple stage IV osteochondritis on MRI with large cysts, osteoarthritis, gout, local infection, abnormal coagulation, and abnormal lower limb alignment; a history of surgery or ESWT to the ankle; those who required surgical repair of ankle ligaments or to treat other local lesions; pregnancy, deaf-muteness, and mental disorders; and those who could not guarantee to attend for follow-up. Ethical approval for this prospective study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China (registration number KY2017-8). All patients gave written informed consent.

A total of 44 patients were assessed at presentation, and 40 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned to either the rESWT or the control group. No patient was lost to follow-up. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups (Table I).

Table I.

Demographic and clinical characteristics by group (n = 40).

Variable rESWT Control p-value
Patients, n 20 20
Sex, n 0.752*
Male 10 9
Female 10 11
Mean age, yrs (SD) 47.40 (11.87) 46.70 (13.44) 0.862
Mean BMI, kg/m2 (SD) 26.18 (3.16) 24.82 (3.21) 0.072
Side, n (%) 0.342*
Left 8 11
Right 12 9
History of trauma, n (%) 12 (60) 12 (60) 1.000*
Mean duration of symptoms, mths (SD) 36.80 (37.80) 23.60 (17.61) 0.505
Mean AOFAS score (SD) 62.05 (6.85) 62.00 (4.65) 0.979
Mean pain VAS (SD) 6.10 (1.12) 6.00 (1.08) 0.775
Mean BME area on MRI, mm2 (SD) 86.22 (13.53) 85.66 (22.55) 0.925
  1. *

    Chi-squared test.

  1. Independent-samples t-test.

  1. Mann-Whitney U test.

  1. AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society; BME, bone marrow oedema; rESWT, radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy; SD, standard deviation; VAS, visual analogue scale.

Patients were randomized by a computer-generated process in a 1:1 ratio, by the opening of a sealed envelope. The rESWT or its sham was subsequently undertaken by a physiotherapist not involved in the further management of the patients. The sham treatment was performed exactly as the rESWT, with a device which was similar in design, shape, vibration, and sound, but without shockwaves.

The patients, the outcome assessors, the research workers collecting and analyzing the data, and the authors were all blinded to the allocation of treatment. The therapist providing the rESWT and sham rESWT was not blinded. The blinding would not be revealed until the results were analyzed.

The preferred method of anaesthesia was lumbar plexus or sciatic nerve block or a spinal epidural. Patients were placed in a supine position and a thigh tourniquet was applied on the affected side while keeping the hip and knee flexed. A noninvasive traction device was used. Routine anteromedial and anterolateral portals were used for arthroscopy of the ankle with a 2.7 mm arthroscope. Proliferative inflammatory synovium was removed, and the damaged cartilage was debrided down to smooth stable articular cartilage. Routine microfracture was then undertaken,21 with holes 3 to 4 mm apart with a depth of 2 to 4 mm. After releasing the tourniquet, marrow fat droplets and blood were seen to flow out of the holes. After routine wound closure, the ankle was immobilized in a short leg cast.

Three weeks postoperatively, those in the rESWT group were placed in a sitting or supine position, with the affected foot fixed on a stent or pillow. The positioning point of treatment was determined by the location of the osteochondritis on the MRI scans, the anatomical landmarks and the area of tenderness. The rESWT was administered using an EMS DolorClast and an EVO BLUE treatment head (both by Electro Medical Systems, Switzerland) with a diameter of 15 mm. The energy of the treatment was set to 1.5 to 2.0 bar, the energy flux density was between 0.02 and 0.05 mJ/mm2 with a frequency of 6 Hz. Coupling gel was applied between the head of the treatment device and the patient’s skin to minimize the loss of shockwave energy, for better transmission of the wave. The therapist selected two or three treatment points for each treatment, each point receiving 1,000 impulses. Treatment was undertaken once every other day for five treatments.

Baseline data involved the demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, height, weight, duration of symptoms, history of trauma, and the location of the osteochondritis. Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the ankle and MRI scans (0.2 T ARTOSCAN-C; ESAOTE, Italy) were obtained. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain were used to assess pain and function of the ankle.22,23 The patients were reviewed regularly to record the complications. Assessments were recorded at baseline and at six weeks, and three, six, and 12 months, postoperatively. The AOFAS and VAS pain scores were recorded at each time. Further MRI scans were performed at three, six, and 12 months to record the area of talar bone marrow oedema. The AOFAS and VAS pain scores were recorded by one examiner (CCZ). The MRI scans were assessed independently by two experienced radiologists (JC, CGZ). Minics software (Materialise, Belgium) was used to determine the largest area of talar bone marrow oedema in the sagittal fat suppression sequence. The recorded result was the mean of the value recorded by the two radiologists.

Intermittent ice compression was given within 72 hours after surgery with movement of the toes and straight leg raising. The cast was removed five days postoperatively when intermittent dorsi- and plantarflexion was commenced. At four weeks, the patient began to bear 10% of the body weight with an increase of 10% every day until reaching full weightbearing at eight weeks, when swimming, cycling, and other exercises could be undertaken.

Statistical analysis

On the basis of previous studies, an alternative hypothesis was that the AOFAS score would be ten points higher in the rESWT group compared with the control group.24 The standard deviation (SD) of the AOFAS score was estimated to be ten points. We calculated that a sample of 16 in each group would be required to detect this difference, with a power of 90% and an α of 5%, with two-sided testing at a significance level of 0.05, assuming 10% loss to follow-up.

Continuous variables for all parameters were expressed as mean (SD) and variables were expressed as the number of patients (percentage) at each timepoint separately for the patients in the two groups. After determining, using the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test, whether the distribution of age, BMI, duration of symptoms, AOFAS and VAS pain score, and area of bone marrow oedema on MRI of the patients in both groups at baseline were consistent with a Gaussian distribution, baseline comparisons were performed with independent-samples t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-squared tests.

The development of mean AOFAS and VAS pain scores and the mean area of bone marrow oedema after treatment was investigated using a two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (two-way RM ANCOVA), followed by parametric estimating for pairwise comparisons. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Calculations were performed using SPSS v. 25 (IBM, USA) and GraphPad Prism v. 8.2.1 (GraphPad, USA).

Results

The mean AOFAS scores for the ESWT and control groups at baseline were 62.05 (SD 6.85) and 62.00 (SD 4.65), respectively, and improved in both groups during the study period to 93.75 (SD 4.89) and 89.05 (SD 6.11) (Figure 1a). The general linear model-repeated measurement (GLM-RM) procedure showed a significant effect for time (p < 0.001) and an interaction effect for treatment × time (p = 0.002). Parametric estimating showed statistically significant differences between the groups (Supplementary Table i).

Fig. 1 
          Data of the two groups at baseline, six weeks, three, six, and 12 months. a) American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. b) Visual analogue scale (VAS). c) The area of bone marrow oedema (BME) in the talus detected on sagittal fat suppression sequence MRI scans. ESWT, extracorporeal shockwave therapy.

Fig. 1

Data of the two groups at baseline, six weeks, three, six, and 12 months. a) American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. b) Visual analogue scale (VAS). c) The area of bone marrow oedema (BME) in the talus detected on sagittal fat suppression sequence MRI scans. ESWT, extracorporeal shockwave therapy.

The mean VAS pain scores for the rESWT and control groups were 6.10 (SD 1.12) and 6.00 (SD 1.08) at baseline, respectively, and decreased in both groups during the study period to 1.30 (SD 0.92) and 2.40 (SD 1.39) (Figure 1b).The GLM-RM procedure showed a significant effect for time (p < 0.001) and an interaction effect for treatment × time (p = 0.005). The parametric estimating showed statistically significant differences between the groups (Supplementary Table i).

The mean areas of bone marrow oedema are shown in Table II. These areas for the rESWT and control groups were 86.22 mm2 (SD 13.53) and 85.66 mm2 (SD 22.55) at baseline, respectively, and decreased in both groups over the study period to 19.96 mm2 (SD 12.00) and 41.86 mm2 (SD 13.82) (Figure 1c). The GLM-RM procedure showed a significant effect for time (p < 0.001) and an interaction effect for treatment × time (p < 0.001). Parametric estimating showed statistically significant differences between the groups at six and 12 months (p < 0.001) (Figure 2, Supplementary Table i).

Table II.

Outcome measures in the two groups.

Measure ESWT mean (SD) Control mean (SD)
Baseline 6 wks 3 mths 6 mths 12 mths Baseline 6 wks 3 mths 6 mths 12 mths
AOFAS score 62.05 (6.85) 67.95 (4.45) 83.30 (5.96) 89.10 (4.84) 93.75 (4.89) 62.00 (4.65) 69.10 (6.89) 77.20 (6.58) 84.10 (4.76) 89.05 (6.11)
VAS 6.10 (1.12) 4.35 (1.04) 2.60 (1.10) 1.75 (1.07) 1.30 (0.92) 6.00 (1.08) 4.80 (1.11) 3.85 (1.18) 3.05 (1.73) 2.40 (1.39)
BME area, mm2 86.22 (13.53) N/A 53.33 (12.41) 33.53 (8.36) 19.96 (12.00) 85.66 (22.55) N/A 59.06 (22.20) 48.58 (14.64) 41.86 (13.82)
  1. AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society; BME, bone marrow oedema; ESWT, extracorporeal shockwave therapy; N/A, not applicable; SD, standard deviation; VAS, visual analogue scale.

Fig. 2 
          MRI images showing the changes in bone marrow oedema in the rESWT and control groups. Yellow and green arrows indicate areas of bone marrow oedema.

Fig. 2

MRI images showing the changes in bone marrow oedema in the rESWT and control groups. Yellow and green arrows indicate areas of bone marrow oedema.

Two patients (10%) in the ESWT group had a mild complication with transient reddening of the skin after a treatment, which disappeared within 24 hours. No serious adverse events were reported.

Discussion

As far as we are aware, this is the first randomized double-blind controlled trial of arthroscopic microfracture combined with rESWT in the management of osteochondiritis of the talus that compared the results with sham rESWT. We found that the effect of rESWT after arthroscopic microfracture in these patients was significantly better than that after microfracture alone. There were no serious complications after 12 months. It is the first study to have also combined the results of subjective assessments (AOFAS and VAS pain scores) with objective radiological results (MRI).

The aim of the treatment of this condition is to create a stable environment for cartilage repair, to eliminate pain and restore function of the ankle. Many surgical procedures have been developed with the aim of producing long-lasting repair of the cartilage, but none is perfect. Microfracture is particularly used to treat small lesions, with an area of < 1.5 cm2. It relies on pluripotent MSCs in bone marrow to fill cartilage defects and form fibrin clots, which then form fibrocartilage repair tissue through redifferentiation.21,25 Compared with untreated defects, microfracture has been shown to fill the defect with repair tissue, improve symptoms, and restore patients’ athletic ability.26,27 Many authors have shown that microfracture can achieve good early and mid-term results, and we have confirmed this.27-30 However, a retrospective study showed that 15 of 78 patients (19.2%) who underwent arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondritis of the talus still complained of pain and restricted weightbearing three months after surgery,18 suggesting that further treatment is needed to improve its efficacy.

Shockwave treatment has become a conventional part of the management of chronic pain in sports medicine. Compared with conventional focused EWST, rESWT has the greatest energy at its source. Its treatment is therefore more superficial, but can spread to treat larger areas than conventional ESWT,31 which is more suited to the management of deep indications, such as avascular necrosis of the hip joint, whereas rESWT may be more suitable for superficial indications, such as osteochondritis of the talus.

The mechanism of action of the combined technology is still unclear and needs to be further explored. Potential mechanisms of action of rESWT in these patients include repeated mechanical stimulation of the area, microinjuries that stimulate bone remodelling, and some chondroprotective effects including reduction in the level of nitric oxide locally, chondrocyte apoptosis and increased vascular endothelial growth factor, bone morphogenetic protein-2, and osteocalcin in the subchondral bone.32-39 A combination of these factors may produce a therapeutic effect in osteochondritis.

Ahn et al40 showed that changes in the volume of bone marrow oedema after microfracture were correlated with the prognosis. Patients with new oedema or an increased volume of oedema postoperatively had worse outcomes. Transient oedema after bone marrow stimulation is considered a reactive response to the penetration of the subchondral bone by microfracture, but persistent oedema may be pathological after bone marrow stimulation in osteochondritis.41 Thus, we used the change in the area of marrow oedema as an indicator to observe. Current studies have confirmed that the defect after microfracture is mainly filled with fibrocartilage composed of type I collagen, not natural hyaline cartilage composed of type II collagen, which is structurally and biomechanically inferior.42,43 We used low-resolution MRI instead of high-resolution MRI when measuring the area of bone marrow oedema, to reflect the efficacy of the repair of the injured cartilage. We found that most patients with osteochondritis of the talus showed significant improvement in this area 12 months after microfrcature combined with rESWT. This is consistent with recently reported results of shockwave therapy combined with retrograde autologous bone marrow cell transplantation for patients with osteochondritis of the talus;24 and was also confirmed in a recent study of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for bone marrow oedema syndrome of the foot.44

There is currently no standard advice for early or delayed weightbearing after arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondritis of the talus. However, it was reported in a recent meta-analysis that good outcomes could be achieved with both early and delayed weightbearing after microfracture.45 In our study, due to the addition of rESWT after surgery and the need for adequate rest during this, partial weightbearing was started from four weeks and full weightbearing at eight weeks after surgery and satisfactory outcomes were obtained. We therefore recommend this programme of postoperative weightbearing.

This study has limitations. So far, the mechanism of repair after rESWT has been insufficiently investigated. Although this was a prospective single-centre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, the sample size was small and the follow-up was relatively short. However, it was originally designed as a short-term trial and patients who received other forms of treatment, such as analgesic medication or physiotherapy, were excluded. Therefore, we could not carry out long-term follow-ups, especially in the control group. We also chose the use of low-resolution rather than high-resolution MRI when assessing the area of bone marrow oedema. In a future study, high-resolution MRI and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART)46 scoring systems should be used to assess the repair of the damaged cartilage. However, the results of this study are encouraging. The sample size should be expanded in a multicentre study in the future to further verify our findings.

In summary, we found that, in patients who undergo arthroscopic microfracture osteochondritis of the talus, it was safe to perform local shockwave therapy after the wounds had healed. The combination of microfracture and shockwave therapy was more effective than microfracture alone, in the relief of pain, at three months postoperatively. This combination also resulted in improved weightbearing and motor function of the ankle.


Correspondence should be sent to Xiaojun Duan. E-mail:

References

1. O’Loughlin PF , Heyworth BE , Kennedy JG . Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle . Am J Sports Med . 2010 ; 38 ( 2 ): 392 404 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

2. Alford JW , Cole BJ . Cartilage restoration, part 1: basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options . Am J Sports Med . 2005 ; 33 ( 2 ): 295 306 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

3. Dekker TJ , Dekker PK , Tainter DM , Easley ME , Adams SB . Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a critical analysis review . JBJS Rev . 2017 ; 5 ( 3 ): e4 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

4. Zhang C , Ao Y , Cao J , Yang L , Duan X . Donor cell fate in particulated juvenile allograft cartilage for the repair of articular cartilage defects . Am J Sports Med . 2020 ; 48 ( 13 ): 3224 3232 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

5. Hurley ET , Stewart SK , Kennedy JG , Strauss EJ , Calder J , Ramasamy A . Current management strategies for osteochondral lesions of the talus . Bone Joint J . 2021 ; 103-B ( 2 ): 207 212 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

6. Gianakos AL , Yasui Y , Hannon CP , Kennedy JG . Current management of talar osteochondral lesions . World J Orthop . 2017 ; 8 ( 1 ): 12 20 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

7. Giannini S , Vannini F . Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review . Foot Ankle Int . 2004 ; 25 ( 3 ): 168 175 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

8. Hannon CP , Bayer S , Murawski CD , et al. Debridement, curettage, and bone marrow stimulation: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle . Foot Ankle Int . 2018 ; 39 ( 1 ): 16S 22S . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

9. Ferkel RD , Zanotti RM , Komenda GA , et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long-term results . Am J Sports Med . 2008 ; 36 ( 9 ): 1750 1762 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

10. Murawski CD , Kennedy JG . Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2013 ; 95-A ( 11 ): 1045 1054 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

11. Zengerink M , Szerb I , Hangody L , Dopirak RM , Ferkel RD , van Dijk CN . Current concepts: treatment of osteochondral ankle defects . Foot Ankle Clin . 2006 ; 11 ( 2 ): 331 359 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

12. Ma HZ , Zeng BF , Li XL . Upregulation of VEGF in subchondral bone of necrotic femoral heads in rabbits with use of extracorporeal shock waves . Calcif Tissue Int . 2007 ; 81 ( 2 ): 124 131 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

13. Wang FS , Yang KD , Chen RF , Wang CJ , Sheen-Chen SM . Extracorporeal shock wave promotes growth and differentiation of bone-marrow stromal cells towards osteoprogenitors associated with induction of TGF-beta1 . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2002 ; 84-B ( 3 ): 457 461 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

14. Romeo P , Lavanga V , Pagani D , Sansone V . Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders: a review . Med Princ Pract . 2014 ; 23 ( 1 ): 7 13 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

15. Milstrey A , Rosslenbroich S , Everding J , et al. Antibiofilm efficacy of focused high-energy extracorporeal shockwaves and antibiotics in vitro . Bone Joint Res . 2021 ; 10 ( 1 ): 77 84 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

16. Wang FS , Wang CJ , Huang HJ , Chung H , Chen RF , Yang KD . Physical shock wave mediates membrane hyperpolarization and Ras activation for osteogenesis in human bone marrow stromal cells . Biochem Biophys Res Commun . 2001 ; 287 ( 3 ): 648 655 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

17. Lyon R , Liu XC , Kubin M , Schwab J . Does extracorporeal shock wave therapy enhance healing of osteochondritis dissecans of the rabbit knee?: a pilot study . Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2013 ; 471 ( 4 ): 1159 1165 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

18. Zhang C , Huang H , Yang L , Duan X . Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pain relief after arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of talus . J Foot Ankle Surg . 2020 ; 59 ( 1 ): 190 194 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

19. Auersperg V , Buch M , Gerdesmeyer L , et al. Consensus statement recommendations for the use of extracorporeal shockwave technology in medical indications . The 11th Meeting of ISMST ; 2008 , Juan les Pins, France . https://www.shockwavetherapy.org/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumente/PDFs/Formulare/ismst-consensus-statement-indications-2015.pdf ( date last accessed 16 August 2023 ). Google Scholar

20. Hepple S , Winson IG , Glew D . Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a revised classification . Foot Ankle Int . 1999 ; 20 ( 12 ): 789 793 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

21. Steadman JR , Rodkey WG , Rodrigo JJ . Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects . Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2001 ; S362 9 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

22. Ibrahim T , Beiri A , Azzabi M , Best AJ , Taylor GJ , Menon DK . Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales . J Foot Ankle Surg . 2007 ; 46 ( 2 ): 65 74 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

23. Kitaoka HB , Alexander IJ , Adelaar RS , Nunley JA , Myerson MS , Sanders M . Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes . Foot Ankle Int . 1994 ; 15 ( 7 ): 349 353 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

24. Gao F , Chen N , Sun W , et al. Combined therapy with shock wave and retrograde bone marrow-derived cell transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus . Sci Rep . 2017 ; 7 ( 1 ): 2106 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

25. Steadman JR , Rodkey WG , Briggs KK . Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes . J Knee Surg . 2002 ; 15 ( 3 ): 170 176 . PubMed Google Scholar

26. Mithoefer K , Williams RJ 3rd , Warren RF , Wickiewicz TL , Marx RG . High-impact athletics after knee articular cartilage repair: a prospective evaluation of the microfracture technique . Am J Sports Med . 2006 ; 34 ( 9 ): 1413 1418 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

27. Saxena A , Eakin C . Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autogenous bone graft . Am J Sports Med . 2007 ; 35 ( 10 ): 1680 1687 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

28. Becher C , Driessen A , Hess T , Longo UG , Maffulli N , Thermann H . Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2010 ; 18 ( 5 ): 656 663 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

29. Chuckpaiwong B , Berkson EM , Theodore GH . Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases . Arthroscopy . 2008 ; 24 ( 1 ): 106 112 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

30. Gobbi A , Francisco RA , Lubowitz JH , Allegra F , Canata G . Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation . Arthroscopy . 2006 ; 22 ( 10 ): 1085 1092 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

31. van der Worp H , van den Akker-Scheek I , van Schie H , Zwerver J . ESWT for tendinopathy: technology and clinical implications . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2013 ; 21 ( 6 ): 1451 1458 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

32. Huang C , Holfeld J , Schaden W , Orgill D , Ogawa R . Mechanotherapy: revisiting physical therapy and recruiting mechanobiology for a new era in medicine . Trends Mol Med . 2013 ; 19 ( 9 ): 555 564 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

33. Da Costa Gómez TM , Radtke CL , Kalscheur VL , et al. Effect of focused and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on equine bone microdamage . Vet Surg . 2004 ; 33 ( 1 ): 49 55 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

34. Burr DB . Targeted and nontargeted remodeling . Bone . 2002 ; 30 ( 1 ): 2 4 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

35. Wang C-J , Weng L-H , Ko J-Y , Sun Y-C , Yang Y-J , Wang F-S . Extracorporeal shockwave therapy shows chondroprotective effects in osteoarthritic rat knee . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . 2011 ; 131 ( 8 ): 1153 1158 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

36. Ma HZ , Zeng BF , Li XL . Upregulation of VEGF in subchondral bone of necrotic femoral heads in rabbits with use of extracorporeal shock waves . Calcif Tissue Int . 2007 ; 81 ( 2 ): 124 131 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

37. Wang C-J , Hsu S-L , Weng L-H , Sun Y-C , Wang F-S . Extracorporeal shockwave therapy shows a number of treatment related chondroprotective effect in osteoarthritis of the knee in rats . BMC Musculoskelet Disord . 2013 ; 14 : 44 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

38. Wang C-J , Sun Y-C , Wong T , Hsu S-L , Chou W-Y , Chang H-W . Extracorporeal shockwave therapy shows time-dependent chondroprotective effects in osteoarthritis of the knee in rats . J Surg Res . 2012 ; 178 ( 1 ): 196 205 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

39. Zhao Z , Ji H , Jing R , et al. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy reduces progression of knee osteoarthritis in rabbits by reducing nitric oxide level and chondrocyte apoptosis . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . 2012 ; 132 ( 11 ): 1547 1553 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

40. Ahn J , Choi JG , Jeong BO . Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus are better in patients with decreased postoperative subchondral bone marrow edema . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2021 ; 29 ( 5 ): 1570 1576 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

41. Shimozono Y , Hurley ET , Yasui Y , Deyer TW , Kennedy JG . The presence and degree of bone marrow edema influence midterm clinical outcomes after microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus . Am J Sports Med . 2018 ; 46 ( 10 ): 2503 2508 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

42. Corr D , Raikin J , O’Neil J , Raikin S . Long-term outcomes of microfracture for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus . Foot Ankle Int . 2021 ; 42 ( 7 ): 833 840 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

43. Yang H-Y , Lee K-B . Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus: second-look arthroscopic and magnetic resonance analysis of cartilage repair tissue outcomes . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2020 ; 102-A ( 1 ): 10 20 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

44. Cao J , Zhang C , Huang H , Yang L , Duan X . Bone marrow edema syndrome of the foot treated with extracorporeal shock wave therapy: a retrospective case series . J Foot Ankle Surg . 2021 ; 60 ( 3 ): 523 528 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

45. Song M , Li S , Yang S , Dong Q , Lu M . Is early or delayed weightbearing the better choice after microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus? A meta-analysis and systematic review . J Foot Ankle Surg . 2021 ; 60 ( 6 ): 1232 1240 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

46. Marlovits S , Striessnig G , Resinger CT , et al. Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging . Eur J Radiol . 2004 ; 52 ( 3 ): 310 319 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

Author contributions

J. Cao: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft.

C. Zhang: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft.

H. Huang: Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft.

C. Zhang: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft.

L. Yang: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft.

X. Duan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding statement

The authors disclose receipt of the following financial or material support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this study was supported by China Ministry of Science and Technology National Key Research and Development Project (Grant No. 2016YFB1101404) and Key Research Project of Chongqing (Grant No. 2021MSXM183).

Data sharing

The data that support the findings for this study are available to other researchers from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to all patients who were treated at the inpatient and outpatient department of our hospital between 1 June 2017 and 31 May 2019 and whose data were considered in this prospective study. We also thank everyone at the Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China for their contribution to the study operations.

Ethical review statement

Ethical approval for this prospective study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China (registration number KY2017-8). All patients gave written informed consent.

Open access funding

The open access fee was funded by the China Ministry of Science and Technology National Key Research and Development Project and Key Research Project of Chongqing.

Open access statement

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Trial registration number

This study was registered at http://www.isrctn.com (trial registration number: ISRCTN82244069).

Supplementary material

Table displaying the results of the statistical analysis.

This article was primary edited by J. Scott.